DentalBuzz: a jolt of current

One CT scan = 200 Panoramics

Apr. 10th, 2012 | Posted by 4 comments

No doubt you listened to the radio or television news today with a double take whut-What? There’s a Yale study that just came out which links the incidence of meningiomas to the frequency of dental radiographs taken during childhood? Your gentle ionizing beam of extrasensory perception is….BEING CRITICIZED?

Yes, yes it is. But have no fear, because the research, my friend, is also having its validity questioned. Supposedly there’s a significant likelihood of being diagnosed with a benign brain tumor if you grew up going to the dentist regularly and having periodic x-rays. This tumor, called a meningioma, is usually asymptomatic, and the vast majority of the time is discovered only when a person has a routine CT scan.

Okay, so is it just me who sees this flaw in the study? People who have CT scans just for “fun” are most likely to go to the dentist for “fun.” Only you should substitute the word “prevention” for “fun.” There were other people in the study who weren’t diagnosed with meningiomas. Was this because they didn’t have CT scans voluntarily (and their parents didn’t take them to the dentist very often, possibly)? And what is the criteria for needing a scan, since we’re criticizing the “need” for dental x-rays? I mean, CT zapping is not exactly radiation-free.

Go read these articles for yourself so that you’ll have well-formed opinions when patients ask about what they’ve heard in the media to help you turn around any radiation defiance that you may come up against in the next few weeks:

Dental X-Rays Linked to Common Brain Tumor, Study Finds – Huffington Post

Web MD: Annual X-rays May Expose Patients to Unnecessary Risk

Dental x-rays can double brain tumor risk – MSNBC.com

All about Meningiomas from Wikipedia

From ABC News: Early Dental X-Rays Linked to Brain Tumors

Now ask yourself who is healthier: the guy who never took a pill or saw a doctor his whole life, and felt great until the day he died? Or the one who did all the preventive stuff and discovered along the way that yes, he had some imperfections that needed to be treated?

See, it’s a stupid question that is irrelevant. Put it to bed, put this story to bed, go scare the masses with something fun. And yummy. And dangerous.

Like sugar.

For other reading, here’s a PDF of the ADA’s radiography recommendations, along with a previous DentalBuzz parody about radiation safety, and a comparison of dental radiation doses to other medical radiation doses.


4 comments Add a comment

  1. Eva

    “As an underemployed RDH, I have loads of time on my hands to develop the most innovative, diagnostic tool to detect interproximal caries and subsequent infections which will take the place of ionizing radiation as the current means of radiographic interpretation. I’ll keep the public informed of my efforts.

    In the meantime, for those patients who have cavities in between their teeth that dental professionals cannot see clinically and whom do not wish to have radiographs taken, I shall endeavor to promote my remote viewing techniques http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing and share the information with dentists. As a dental hygienist, I cannot, legally, diagnose caries.

    So… let the project begin!”


  2. Arlington Dental Implants

    I always check the studies, especial ones like these. Good information here.


  3. Pete from Dental Imaging

    Have a look at our dose comparison chart, there is a lot of difference between the different brands of CBCT out there. http://www.360v.co.uk


  4. Implant Dentist Arlington TX

    It’s pretty biased. You need a HUGE study in order to get any where near decent accurate numbers when you’re talking about health issues related to x-rays.


Add a Comment





reset all fields

Archives