When people talk about what they hate most about going to the dentist, they’re usually talking about the needle. I mean, who in their right mind would ever consent to allowing another person to give a shot in a place that has as many nerve endings as our tongues, lips and cheeks? Shots in the mouth are pretty dang scary. And when you’re trying to calm down and prepare yourself for an injection, it’s almost worse than trying to relax for the air-burst thingy they do at the optometrist’s office when you’re getting your eye pressure checked.
And yet, anyone who has had significant dental treatment performed has allowed someone to inject their mouth with a needle, right? We’ve all accepted the fact that shots are so much better than the actual thing that we hate about going to the dentist.
Pain. Pain is what we really hate.
And shots? They make pain go bye-bye. No shot? You’re all-knowing (in a very bad way) about every little thing that is getting fixed in your mouth.
But you already realize this unpleasant truth. What you might not know is that there’s a stink in Texas right now about who can give shots at the dentist’s office and who can’t. Here’s a little backstory: Dentists go to college for 6-8 years to learn all the things they need to do in order to be dentists. Dental hygienists are in college for 2-4 years to learn everything they need to learn in order to be dental hygienists. In states that allow dental hygienists to give shots, their anesthesia education follows the same curriculum as dentists. These states also test dentists and hygienists to make sure that they are qualified to give shots before granting their licenses.
In Texas and five other states, this is not true. A dental hygienist’s education in regards to anesthetic delivery is considered inferior, and therefore, allowing hygienists to stick a needle in a patient’s mouth allegedly places the public in unnecessary danger.
On this map, you’ll see red states, with years next to their abbreviations. These are the states that allow hygienists to give shots, along with the dates when administration and licensing first became available. [edit: See image at update at the bottom of this article – this was amended to 47 states in 2023]
Do I think that Texas should allow dental hygienists to give shots just because “everyone else is doing it?” No. We tried being our own country once, and if we still were our own country we wouldn’t care one tiddly bit what was going on in the US.
The reason that Texas should allow dental hygienists to give shots is simple:
We are tired of hurting people.
The alternative is to ask the dentists we work with to leave a hole in their schedule so they can come give a shot for us. And come anesthetize again if the first time didn’t work. And again if our patient is still in pain.
Here in Texas, hygienists learn to say “I’m Sorry” a lot to our patients, instead of continuing to interrupt our dentists.
Thankfully, most of our patients don’t need shots. Those who come regularly have healthy mouths and their visits with the dental hygienist are preventive in nature, comfortable, maybe even relaxing. But take a person who has been scared to go to the dentist for a while and they’ve noticed that their gums bleed when they brush. There are sores in their gums, and guess what? The treatment it takes to heal up those sores can hurt! Hygienists in all states are highly trained to provide this deeper therapy – it’s what we “really” do. And if there are obstacles to providing this treatment painlessly, well, it’s either not going to be painless, or else the treatment won’t be as thorough as it would have been if it would have been if the patient had gotten completely numb.
Last week’s hearing of the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human services highlighted the stances of those both in favor and against granting dental hygienists the permission to deliver local anesthesia, in other words “give shots.” The original video was 2 1/2 hours – I’ve shortened it down to a little under 40 minutes of testimony only about this bill, edited out all the procedural or repetitive bits, and left the juiciest parts behind.
Full video of the archived meeting: http://tlcsenate.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=42&clip_id=11813
Here are my bullet points, yes… •Bullet •Points for this committee meeting:
• The map handed out in the chamber is the same one you see in this article (feel free to scroll up and follow along).
• The bill is permissive, not mandatory. If a dentist does not want to allow a hygienist in their office to give shots, they can’t. Furthermore, dentists must be present in the office for hygienists to administer anesthetics.
• No evidence of harm is presented in any testimony. Scroll to 18:45 where you’ll see Dr. Scott Dowell testifying for the Texas Society of Periodontists against this bill. His admission of the relative danger of local anesthesia is…interesting.
• The Texas Dental Association states that they opposed to this bill due to patient safety because they feel that it lowers the education standard and it’s only about expanding dental hygienist’s scope of practice, possibly to open the door to independent practice by hygienists.
• Dr. Matthew Roberts, who represented the Texas Dental Association, seemed surprised to learn that physicians are legally allowed to delegate the duty of administering anesthesia shots to even medical assistants in their practice when this is brought up in the meeting.
• There are 9000 members of the Texas Dental Association, but in a poll, 53% of the members were actually in favor of hygienists giving shots.
• The amount of training dentists receive to legally put patients “to sleep” is less than the training hygienists receive in order to be legal to give shots.
If you’re not convinced by this video, then you didn’t actually watch it (my opinion, sheesh!). But if you did watch it and still feel like hygienists are unqualified to give shots, your voice is very important to us right now. Maybe there are more problems with hygienists using needles, maybe there are negative reports that haven’t been correlated properly. Do you have concerns? Post them here in the comments below. I’m serious – if there is a compelling reason that is being hidden from the public and even from hygienists, we all deserve to know the truth.
At this point, though, if the day ever comes when I’ll be able to give my patients shots, it will be like someone trusted me with the most delicate equipment available in the Compassion Toolbox. It is a precious gift to be able to deliver painless dental care, and for those in the caring business (which most of medicine is, if you think about it) sometimes it’s the best gift we can give to others.
Yuck, ick, too late, the mush landed. Bottom line? Please don’t hate me if I ever get to stick you with a needle.
Trish Walraven RDH, BSDH is a dental hygienist who lives in the suburbs of Dallas/Fort Worth. She longs for the day when she can drop a couple grand of her own money and leave her family to take a week-long college course, just so she can sit for an anxiety-provoking board exam that will grant her the license to poke a shot in places that no one wants poked. Goals, man. Goals.
UPDATE 4/5/2017: The April newsletter from the TSBDE states that SB 430, which would authorize dental hygienists to administer local anesthetic was heard in the Senate Health and Human Services Committee on March 8, 2017. The committee considered testimony both for and against the legislation. The bill was voted out of the Health and Human Services Committee on April 5, 2017 with some changes. The change is that only infiltration administration would be permitted. The bill is now waiting to be scheduled to be heard by the full Senate.
UPDATE 5/25/2023:
It’s been six years since the original article above was posted; however, today I received the following information:
“After almost a year of collaboration between TDHA [Texas Dental Hygienists’ Association] and TDA [Texas Dental Association], legislation passed today through the Texas Senate that would allow Texas dental hygienists to administer local infiltration anesthesia.
The last step is for Governor Abbott to approve and sign the bill which would then become law. After the legislation is signed by the Governor, the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners will be tasked to write specific rules and educational requirements that will align with the intent of the legislation. This is a lengthy process that can take up to a year. The rules will then need final approval from the Governor’s Office.
Please note – this legislation allows dental hygienists to administer local anesthesia under the direct supervision of a dentist via infiltration only to patients who are over the age of 18.”
Here’s the thing: this was also the biggest bone of contention even in the 80’s and 90’s for the majority of Texas dental hygienists. For over 30 years we have been arguing for this option! That’s pretty much the scope of an entire career. Enough said – all you 50+ year olds who’ve been waiting for this day? See y’all back in college soon!
Rachel Smith RDH says
Trish!
Thank you for championing this. I was originally licensed in the state of Missouri in 1988. Since the 1970’s Missouri has allowed RDH to give local. Never did I realize what a great way this was to keep my patients comfortable. Then I moved to Texas. First I was shocked that the DDS’s I worked for were annoyed to come and get my patients comfortable? What ? How is this good practice ? Then I had so many patients come into practices I worked in complaining about how painful and unpleasant experiences were with previous hygienists. I also have worked with many respected hygienists who will not ask for local and decide to do the best they can with high powered topical. I know from following them that they always do what is necessary due to patient discomfort. I like you will pay the money, do the training and sit through whatever to be able to do basic standard of care that the rest of the country does on a daily basis.
Janessa Bock says
If you haven’t already, please call or email the members of the HHS Senate Committee and tell them you support SB430. Then be sure to call your own Senator and express support. We need everyone calling/emailing. (Including the Drs we know) Then when it comes up on the House side- the bill is HB1201.
Erin RDH says
Trained and licensed for anesthesia in CA. Now live in MS in the dark ages. Thank you for this article and for your passion for painless hygiene visits!! Keep fighting, we’re fighting here, too!!
Zirel K says
C’mon Texas!
Toni says
In my experience, Dental hygienists give more effective and painless injections than dentists do. There has never been a legal issue related to dental hygienists and local anesthesia. Pain control for no surgical periodontal therapy is essential.
West Towers Dental says
Hi Trish,
Dental phobia actually is the fear of dentistry and of receiving dental care. There are some people who suffer lots from this situation. But the thing is why this fear happens? This blog has some right answer of it.
Thanks for sharing!
Eric Miller says
Thanks for this article! My vote; allow the hygienist to give shots. They do a great job and this small practice often adds quite a bit of efficiency to a dental clinic. Unfortunately, where I practice in Hurst, TX, they can’t.
Peter McPherson, DMD says
I hope Texas gets it’s act together soon! Hygienists are more than well qualified to do them. I think SRP that can’t be done effectively due to a lack of anesthesia probably has more long term health risks for patients than hygienists giving injections.
Linda Jorgenson, RDH, BS, RF says
I watched the whole video – it’s so interesting! Those who are opposed to dental hygienists administering local anesthesia (LA) are stuck on the terrible things they speculate will happen. Never mind that in the 44 other states that have allowed hygienists to give LA for years and in some cases DECADES, none of those bad things have ever happened. Most dentists who observe our LA certification courses say that they wish they had received instruction like OURS!
And to draw a line from the administration of LA by hygienists to independent practice and the creation of mid-level dental practitioners is just silly! As if modernizing and expanding the scope of practice for hygienists will begin a cascade of dangerous events. Quite the contrary.
I’ve been a hygienist for 48 years and have been administering local anesthesia since 1998 (in Minnesota) and 2001 (in Wisconsin). I’ve been a dental hygiene educator and taught many students as well as practicing hygienists how to administer LA. We can make hygiene visits more comfortable for our patients and while patients don’t “like” injections – no one does – it enables us to complete our procedures without pain.
Keep working on this Texas! You’re overdue!
KP Miller says
Just had the worst “Novocaine” injection experience in my life. Very painful, very traumatic fir me. We moved to a new area and started going to a new dental practice. I agreed to have “deep cleaning” in one corner of my mouth, so the hygienist administered shots of an anesthetic. Even though she “numbed” the area topically first, I could feel the needle and it seemed like it took forever for the injection to be finished. It was a horrible experience, and makes me reluctant to return to the Livermore Dental Practice.
Sue says
I just had a horrible experience with novaCaine injected by a hygienist . She evidently hit muscle and by the second shot I was shaking uncontrollably had to have oxygen to breathe. BP was 170/90 and pulse 95. Lucky my RN daughter was along because the hygienist did not even know how to take my BP. The procedure was aborted. Now I afraid to go back for the crown .
antenehbelay78 says
I did not miss even one line here, it is do damn interesting. And, all through this all I really wanted to know was ho this is concluded – with a Yes or a No.
Dental hygienists have a tough job at hand and whether or not they wish to give shots to the patients, sometimes it is required (depending on the kind of treatment).
Honestly, if you ask me – I HATE IT. Yes, who wants to be treated like that – it’s like you’re punishing me for not taking good care of the dental health. Okay, and I agree I should have – but, can you please keep this injection away from me? Like really!
Dentists, I don;t know how you feel but we hate it and we hope you hate that do. Is there anything better than we can do (like please).